To learn more about Amazon Sponsored Products, click here. This book is a must-read for free speech enthusiasts, especially when it comes to our future generations. It should prove as useful and timely for First Amendment lawyers as for school administrators and the broader community, and of course for students and the groups in which they engage. Building on an impressive understanding of where the law has taken us in this field, Hudson wisely warns of the regrettable impact of government censorship upon far too many outspoken students and the messages they seek to convey.
Because it explains - in very accessible terms - the human and legal implications of these cases, this important and timely work is an extremely valuable read for anyone interested in the First Amendment, or in education matters generally. The book is an erudite but engaging study of key cases that involve student speech and speech-related conduct that will prove especially fascinating to high school and college students.
The book would make a wonderful supplement to classes studying the First Amendment and an excellent resource for teachers and school administrators seeking to grasp the nuances of student speech. Supreme Court cases, many of whose participants he has personally interviewed, relative to student speech, but also with some of their obscure state and lower federal court precedents, all of which he skillfully weaves into his narrative. There is no better book on student speech.
A History of the Fight for Free Expression in American Schools (Let the People Speak) [David L. Hudson] on lambiase.net *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Let the Students Speak! has 10 ratings and 5 reviews. Kcatty said: Let me give Students Speak!: A History of the Fight for Free Expression in American Schools.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Learn more about Amazon Prime. From a trusted scholar and powerful story teller, an accessible and lively history of free speech, for and about students. Let the Students Speak! David Hudson brings this history vividly alive by drawing from interviews with key student litigants in famous cases, including John Tinker of Tinker v. He goes on to discuss the raging free-speech controversies in public schools today, including dress codes and uniforms, cyberbullying, and the regulation of any violent-themed expression in a post-Columbine and Virginia Tech environment.
This book should be required reading for students, teachers, and school administrators alike. Read more Read less. Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Prescription for the Future: Customers who bought this item also bought. The First Amendment in Schools: A Guide from the First Amendment Center. Sponsored products related to this item What's this?
The Most Dangerous Branch: Inside the Supreme Court's Assault on the Constitution. Planned Collapse of Americanism: Exposing the longer and deeper agenda behind the war on President Trump and Americanism. A Philosophy of Nature. Feeling stressed and overwhelmed with anxiety? Get effective tools in your arsenal to beat procrastination, get more done and claim your life back!
The Science of High Performance: Why do some people drag their feet back merely on a fearful thought, while others always move at a fast pace despite obstacles? What if a few new habits could improve your positive thinking? The Way To Lasting Success: What if you are able to master your inner state on consistent basis? Accelerate your thinking abilities through mental models used by super-achievers.
Let the People Speak Paperback: Beacon Press; Original edition August 16, Language: Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video. Struggling with low self-esteem? Being mindful can help you connect with inner peace and be more self-compassionate. It's time to Exterminate and Incinerate every sorrow, once and for all! Learning How to Let Go: Simple answers about Hospice and End of Life care.
Hospice and clinical end of life care issues made simple. Now available in paperback.
Books, Blogging and More Books for Writers. Would you like to make a living with your writing? This book will show you how with practical tips and examples.
It's time to change your life! Hours of Sudoku puzzles to enjoy! The world is a nasty place," he said.
Berkeley political science professor Jack Citrin began attending UCB in during the advent of the free speech movement, when Berkeley students "viewed ourselves as a beacon of the ability to handle all points of view. Universities expose young people to ideas and challenge what they believe about science, politics, religion or whatever. But many students today exist only in the bubble of what they believe, he said.
Twitter dubbed it TheChalkening. Some Emory students were livid and let the administration know it. One sophomore declared, according to the school newspaper, that protesters were "in pain. The reaction brought scorn from pundits such as HBO's Bill Maher, who said he wanted "to dropkick these kids into a place where there is actual pain.
As Emory sophomore Maya Valderrama, 20, left a February protest denouncing Trump's policy on sanctuary campuses, she said the outcry over the chalkings was overblown. She wasn't threatened by them, she said, but she understood the concern. This wasn't about politics, she said. Pro-Mitt Romney messages on campus hadn't threatened anybody, but Trump is hostile to segments of the student body. The chalkings represented "a visual affirmation of his hatred," Valderrama said.
College students have adopted some new terms to define when and how they feel threatened. A "microaggression" is an indirect, subtle and sometimes even unintentional discrimination against a minority group. Many students and their professors worry that when it comes to issues on campus, emotion rather than logic is driving the debate. Some students complain that hypersensitive classmates railing about "microaggressions," "trigger warnings" and "safe spaces" have committed assault on the First Amendment.
Others, especially minorities, feel Trump's rise to power has emboldened conservative students to spew vitriol. Nathan Korne, a sophomore at Marshall University in West Virginia, welcomes Trump's attacks on political correctness because he's "tired of not being able to discuss open ideas.
Trump is validating right-wingers who always wanted to snuff out certain speech, and his rhetoric has emboldened hatemongers, she said. Two days after Trump's election, she walked through a campus racial profiling protest where a group of counter-protesting bikers called her a terrorist and demanded she leave the country, Ramachandra said. She recently saw the Arab owner of a hookah shop kick a student out of his store over a Trump bumper sticker.
Liberals are more likely than conservatives to suppress speech.
All three have been attacked by students for having extreme far-right views. Meanwhile, left-leaning speakers routinely appear on university campuses without fuss. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education maintains an incomprehensive database of more than attempts to disinvite campus speakers since About three-quarters of the attempts involved pressure from liberals. Evolution and Israel are among the most controversial topics.
But more often the disinvitation attempt stems from disagreements over immigration, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation or abortion. Milo Yiannopoulos is trying to convince colleges that hate speech is cool. The former Breitbart editor made free speech a buzzphrase when Berkeley protests turned violent during his appearance. The demonstrations made Yiannopoulos -- now persona non grata after appearing to condone pederasty -- a free speech martyr at the time.
UC Berkeley's Citrin said that was the point. Yiannopoulos' speech was staged to challenge the school's commitment to free speech, he said. Some students who attended protests against Yiannopoulos' planned speech at Berkeley told CNN they were relieved he couldn't share his message. But others who watched from the fringes were disappointed.
When the chalkings appeared at Emory, some minority students felt targeted, said Lolade Oshin, 21, who is African American. Later, after students complained about feeling hurt, a national columnist wrote their parents should've whipped their "spoiled asses with a cat o'nine tails. One side has grown up having to be sensitive and to navigate a white man's world.
Bigots hide behind free speech, she said, asking: How is it the Trump chalkings were free speech but student protests were not? Say whatever you want, but if I feel you're dehumanizing me, I'm going to use the same right you're using to fight your ideas," she said.
Oshin also sees hypocrisy in the reaction to the Yiannopoulos pederasty controversy. Conservatives defended Yiannopoulos after Berkeley, she said, but when he appeared to condone pedophilia rather than Islamophobia and bigotry, there were crickets from the right. It is very interesting how conservatives are not screaming freedom of speech now," she said.
But as soon as others feel threatened, it is not brought up. University of Oregon law student Garrett Leatham, 29, believes hearing both sides is integral to understanding an issue. We need to know both. Otherwise, we're stuck believing Columbus sailed the ocean blue and helped the Indians," he said.
Teens' brains are developing, and critical thinking is essential to maturity, so "being able to listen to disagreeable opinions when you're that young and understanding what they're saying and why" is important to higher education, he said. Horttor, the University of New Mexico sophomore, says her own growth has been stunted by the testy atmosphere on campus. Horttor's mother is a Christian, but she knows many atheists. The year-old's own leanings? But Horttor is reluctant to ask Christians why they believe and atheists why they don't, because she doesn't want to be ostracized.
She sees a similar reluctance to discuss partying on campus. University administrators and student leaders seem to avoid the topic, she said, for fear of appearing to condone it. Meanwhile, parties play host to fights, binge drinking, drugs and sexual assaults, she said. Why not have forums on the dangers of binge drinking or on signs that a guy might be trying to victimize you? These things need to be addressed so no one gets hurt. Liam Ginn, a freshman at the University of Southern Maine, faced his classmates' fury this year when state Rep.
Lawrence Lockman visited the Portland campus. The lawmaker has lashed out at Islam and gays. In , he apologized for saying that if abortion is legal, rape should be legal, too, because "the rapist's pursuit of sexual freedom doesn't in most cases result in anyone's death.
Students wanted Lockman disinvited, and as chair of the student senate, Ginn was part of a student government vote to remain neutral. He lost some friends over the decision, he said. Originally intended as a cue to alert trauma survivors about disturbing content, "trigger warnings" have since been expanded to include instances involving race, class, sexism and even privilege. Ultimately, Lockman delivered his remarks on immigration -- or "the alien invasion" -- and students engaged him in heated debate, Ginn said.
Asked why he voted to remain neutral, Ginn, 24, said he'd never condone Lockman's rhetoric. But he did a stint in the US Navy before beginning college, and the experience changed his views. They will listen to speakers they disagree with if they're civil.
In , liberal Sen. Senior Hannah Scherlacher, 22, said most of her classmates don't agree with Sanders' views. But when he visited campus there were no protests, no raised hackles, she said.